11问答网
所有问题
当前搜索:
were to be
were
to
be
和are to be的区别。。。
答:
虚拟语气,时态倒退。就是假设的这个情况实际不存在,看后面还有we shall find about fifteen or t中的shall + V原 也更说明了
虚拟语气对将来虚拟用
were
还是were
to
be
?
答:
从句:①if+主语+
were to
do ②if+主语+should/would/could/might+do ③if+主语+did(动词过去式)/were
怎样理解
were
to
be
found?
答:
用
were
to
be
found而不用 were found, 关键是这两个无论是语法形式还是在意思上都不一样。were to be found 是助动词were 加上动词不定式的被动式,构成过去将来时态的被动式,汉语意思:将被找到。were found 是助动词were 加上过去分词,构成一般过去时的被动语态,汉语意思是:(在过去)被找到...
为什么第二题不是用
were
而是were
to
be
?
答:
if
were to
+ 动词原形,是虚拟语气的一种用法,用于与将来事实可能相反的条件句中,这种虚拟时式比较正式,且主句是would+do 2是讲过去如果能勤奋的话...时态不一样
虚拟语气可以there
were
to
be
吗?
答:
虚拟语气中可以出现there
were to be
...的。注意,它出现于对将来的虚拟假设句子里。
同样是表达过去时的被动语态,“
were
to
be
found” 和“were found...
答:
按照语法上来说,这两个应该是不一样的,因为,前面一个短语用了不定式不定式一般从时间上来说表示发生在将来,而且他还有一个表示目的,但是呢,后面一个短语的话,仅仅表示的就是就是被动。这个如果结合具体的上下文完整的句子来看的话,就会看起来比较清晰一点,仅仅就这么一短语的话,确实不是特别的...
is/are/
was
/
were
to
be
done是将来时的被动语态吗
答:
是将来时的被动语态
to
be
和to do的区别是什么?
答:
to
be
是be(am, is , are,
was
,
were
) 动词的不定式。to do 是动词 do的不定式。动词不定式是由“to+动词原形”构成 (有时可以不带to)。其否定形式是“not+动词不定式”(not不与助动词连用)。它属于一种非谓语动词的形式,在句子中不能充当谓语,没有人称和数的变化,但它可以保留动词的...
...the students would have more time
to
play and have fun
答:
,而是“考虑到”的意思,可以看做固定用法,因此句子可以这样理解:考虑到作业更少了,学生们就可以有更多的时间去玩。再举个类似的例子:Given the bad health condition, John couldn't take part in any sports activities.考虑到糟糕的身体状况,约翰不可以参加任何体育活动。希望对你有帮助!
if虚拟语气的三种时态
答:
were
to
do 的可能性最小。If things were to
be
twice,all would be wise.假如凡事都可以重新做一次,人人皆可成为聪明人。(事实是并不是所有的事都可以重新做一次)注意:在书面语中,如果虚拟条件从句中有were,had 或 should,可以把if省略,把这几个词放到主语之前,构成主谓倒装。
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
下一页
尾页
其他人还搜
were to be done用法
was to be
to be表达什么含义
would to be
were to be done
be there to
was to be done
was used to be
be used to do