There being 问题

Question

如题所述

Answer 1

你的问题是关乎分词子句，分词子句的主词，一般与主要句子的主词是一致，如： Walking along the street
I met a fried. Having read the book
I could wer the question. Being ill
I did not go there 但若分词子句的主词，并不是主句的主词时，那时，我们就必须说出分词子句的主词，否则就会出现dangling participle，如： Being fine
I went out for a walk.若果这句的fine是形容天气，而不是形容I，则这句的句子的意思，就表达错误，若是fine是形容天气，这句应写成： The weather being fine
I went out for a walk. 分词子句的主词，与主句的主词不同的例子很多，如下： The rain having ruined my hat
I had to buy a new one. There being no taxi
we had to walk. It being very stormy
she stayed at home. 你的句子出现There，其理由也是如此 希望帮到你！
The sentence is correct. It is rather formal. "There" behaves like a subject in the -ing clause. An example from a grammar textbook:~ There being no further business
the meeting was concluded.
Human being as subject=I was no banana left.However
The subject of phrase be a pronoun=there
eg:- There is no banana left(in the house)
is there? If the formality there is used
verb agrees with the subject
:- There are no bananas (plural in nos.) There is no banana (singular in no.) In conversation the participle phrase is usually made into an Adverb Clause
eg:- Chnage "There being " into:- As there was no banana left
I went... As there being no banana left
I went..... Hence care should be taken in using the (mis-related participles) construction to make sure that the participles are correctly related. The word to which the participle relates should be the same as the subject of the verb.namely
the participles should be correctly related.
参考: google website
Yes
the sentence is corect. The word 'there' serves as the subject. No
the word 'there' cannot be removed from the sentence. Without the word 'there'
'I' would bee the subject. The sentence would mean something like "I went to the supermarket to buy some bananas because I was no bananas left" instead of "I went to the supermarket to buy some bananas because there was no bananas left'.