求英语高手翻译下

Question

公众思想观念上的误导：
婚姻法解释三重点涉及夫妻婚前和婚后财产归属等问题，这些触及了社会公众的敏感神经。该解释引发了媒体的广泛关注和社会的热议。但需要说明的是，这些关注和热议基本都误解了婚姻法解释三，甚至给部分公众造成了思想观念上的误导。一方面，一些女性利益的代表者批评婚姻法解释三体现了男权主义，让负心男人离婚变得更容易；另一方面，一些“社会学家”则煞有介事的宣称新解释会改变人们的婚姻观念，一些被婚房折腾的焦头烂额的“愤青”们欢呼从此似乎可以裸婚了。

我想说的是：
婚姻法解释三被一些媒体称之为新婚姻法，这是一个明显的概念性错误。婚姻法解释三并非新的法律规则，它不过是对于原婚姻法一些原则性规定的具体化，其并未超出婚姻法的立法本意，这也是法律与司法解释的基本区别。声称新解释会改变婚姻观念的专家只能是不懂法律规定的伪专家，渴望以此可以裸婚的年轻人也不过是急急忙忙的抓了根无法救命的稻草而已。至于女性利益代表者炮轰解释三体现了男权主义，也是打错了方向，要打也应该打2001年修改的婚姻法。一句话，婚姻法解释三是新解释，但延续的是旧规则，任何过分的解读和争议都是虚构前提，展开虚假的论证。这些评论和争议看过就算，没有必要那么较真和认真，更不应该被这些舆论所左右。

小组的观点：
对于新婚姻法而言，它只是一个死的法律，人总是活的，我们不能一味的期望法律来维持生命中至关重要的东西，婚姻爱情乃至亲情等等，这些都是我们自己可以改变的，因此，请大家珍惜自己的婚姻，珍惜自己的爱情，不要被世俗侵染。

Answer 1

The idea of the public thought misleading:
Three key involves marriage law explain husband and wife before marriage and after marriage property ownership, touched the social public these sensitive nerve. The explanation triggered a media attention and social hot debate. But need explanation is, these concerns and hot debate have misunderstood the basic marriage law interpretation, and even to part of the public caused the idea of the thoughts of misleading. On one hand, some women to represent the interests of the marriage law embodies the criticism interpretation male kingship, let men become more easily; man divorce On the other hand, some "social scientists" is the story that would change people's new explanation about the marriage, some are bracing over the marriage room that the "anger green" shout from the nude seems to divorce.

I want to say is:
The marriage law explain by some media called three new marriage law, this is a clear conceptual mistakes. The marriage law is not the new law rules interpretation, but it is the principle for the provisions of the marriage law some concrete, which is not beyond the original legislative purpose of marriage law, it also is the legal and judicial interpretation of the basic difference. Says the new explanation will change the experts about the marriage can only be don't understand law expert, eager to make false naked marriage of young people also but is rush caught root can't help straw just. As for women work three representative interests explain embodies the male kingship, is playing in the wrong direction, beat should also play 2001 change marriage law. In a word, the marriage law interpretation is new explanation, but is a continuation of the old rules, any excessive interpretation and dispute is fictional, on the false premise argument. These comments and dispute seen even if, there is no need to involve so earnest, and more should not be the public opinion about that.

Team's point of view:
For new marriage law is concerned, it is just a dead, people are always living law, we can't always expect the law to maintain life is of vital important things, marriage and love family, all of these is we can change, therefore, everyone please cherish your marriage, cherish your love, don't be secular infection.