第1个回答 2010-05-16
Relentless expansion in the process of state-owned enterprises, China's private enterprises is not the only losers, the Chinese media also suffer the impact.
"Business Week" is the latest one being that the impact of the media. The announcement on its Web site, said this month, Beijing-based magazine will be ordered to stop. This is its rivalry with the State Grid Corporation and impose penalties. State Grid Corporation is the leader in state-owned enterprises in China, in 2009, "Fortune" magazine ranked the world's 500 15.
"Business Weekly" has published an article entitled "National Network Empire," the cover article by 25,000 words in length reported that the national power grid company in China is seeking its near monopoly power in the field to the network equipment to expand production.
Why do hope that the national grid moving in this direction, is not difficult to imagine. Last year, China's electricity infrastructure investment to 840 billion dollars
But the "Business Week," the article said, National Grid's plans by government-backed opposition from China Machinery Industry Federation; article also cited an internal document the Federation to support this assertion. Article bluntly blaming the State Grid Corporation's senior leadership, and to the company called "Frankenstein-type giant."
"Business Week" Web site announcement said that the magazine press and publication department "violated propaganda discipline," "will disclose the contents of internal reference", and "the content and the fact that many serious discrepancies."
Notice is not made it clear that "Business Weekly" what exactly occurs the so-called serious discrepancies with the facts.
This is not the first time since the Chinese media reported that the article related to the energy industry and trouble. Three years ago, "Finance" magazine was forced to dismiss a national grid and the same article.
During this time, including Chinese state-owned enterprises and foreign media when dealing with the media, including shows that a new roll the dice. Over the years, the state-owned enterprises have insisted on a review before the article was published, it had agreed to cooperate with journalists. This can to some extent explain why state-owned enterprises and foreign media quoted officials rarely comments.
In the latest, state-owned enterprises has become more aggressive attitude. A few weeks ago, "The Wall Street Journal," a well-known state-owned public relations department received a call about our story about the company's overseas investment reports. The public relations staff began by saying, you illegal exposure of our company's trade secrets; we ask that you immediately remove the article from your website, and explain your sources. The public relations person went on, if you do not obey, we will take legal action against you. Of course, we did not move this article, and rejected the other side of these requirements.
"Business Week" did more good, it said in the announcement: "This result, we accept it."
"Business Week" will resume publication next month, but China business news in the "exposed Inside Story of" action has been yet another hit. Chinese publication before the next to go through the matter and to challenge the National Grid or any other state - in the current public sector giants such detailed attention than ever more important.
第2个回答 2010-05-16
上面的文字如果要真的译的话，没有几个小时是不行的。机译就另当别论了,错误太多，不想说。
如果你真要译，发个信息过来。我可以用邮件给你发过来。
第3个回答 2010-05-16
In the relentless expansion of the process of state-owned enterprises, China's private enterprises is not the only losers, the Chinese media also suffer the impact.
"Business Week" is the latest one being that the impact of the media. The announcement on its Web site, said this month, Beijing-based magazine will suspend business for rectification. This is its rivalry with the State Grid Corporation and impose penalties. State Grid Corporation is the leader in state-owned enterprises in China, in 2009, "Fortune" magazine ranked the world's 500 15.
"Business Weekly" has published an article entitled "National Network Empire," the cover article by reports that the length of 25,000 words, the State Grid Corporation of China is seeking its near monopoly power field extended to the field of power equipment.
Why do hope that the national grid moving in this direction, is not difficult to imagine. Last year, China's electricity infrastructure investment to 840 billion dollars.
But "Business Week," the article said, National Grid's plans by government-backed opposition from China Machinery Industry Federation; The article also cited an internal document of the Federation to support this assertion. Article bluntly blaming the State Grid Corporation's senior leadership, and to the company called "Frankenstein-type giant."
"Business Week" Web site announcement said that the magazine press and publication department "violated propaganda discipline," "will disclose the contents of internal reference", and "the content and the fact that many serious discrepancies."
Notice is not it clear, "Business Week" what exactly occurs the so-called serious discrepancies with the facts.
This is not the first time since the Chinese media reported that the article related to the energy industry and trouble. Three years ago, "Finance" magazine was forced to dismiss a national grid and the same article.
During this time, including Chinese state-owned enterprises and foreign media when dealing with the media, including shows that a new roll the dice. Over the years, the state-owned enterprises have insisted on a review before the article was published, it had agreed to cooperate with journalists. This can to some extent explain why state-owned enterprises and foreign media quoted officials rarely comments.
In the latest, state-owned enterprises has become more aggressive attitude. A few weeks ago, "The Wall Street Journal," a well-known state-owned public relations department received a call about our story about the company's overseas investment reports. The public relations staff began by saying, you illegal exposure of our company's trade secrets; we ask that you immediately remove the article from your website, and explain your sources. The public relations person went on, if you do not obey, we will take legal action against you. Of course, we did not move this article, and rejected the other side of these requirements.
"Business Week" did more good, it said in the announcement: "This result, we accept it."
"Business Week" will resume publication next month, but the Chinese business news in the "exposed Inside Story of" action has been yet another hit. Chinese publication before the next to go through the matter and to challenge the National Grid or any other state - in the current public sector giants such careful attention than ever more important.
第4个回答 2010-05-16
In the process of state-owned enterprises, the cruel expansion of the private enterprises in China are not the only loser, Chinese media are suffering.
Bisiness weekly is the latest in a by the impact of the media. The announcement said on its website issued, the headquarters is located in Beijing's weekly sate this month. The state grid corporation is its reasoning with penalties. State grid corporation of China's state-owned enterprises is the leader in 2009, the fortune global 500 ranking 15th.
Bisiness weekly published a titled "empire of SGC cover articles with 25,000 word length, reported by state grid corporation is seeking to it in China power grid domain near-monopoly status of the power equipment manufacturing field to expand.
State grid why hope toward the direction, it is not hard to imagine. Last year, China to power infrastructure investment 840 billion dollars.
But the bisiness weekly, said the state grid plan by government support of the China machinery industry federation opposed. Article also cited federation of an internal documents to support the claim. The outspoken to spear-headed by state grid corporation of the senior leadership, and put the company called "frankenstein type giant".
Bisiness weekly web site, said the announcement that the press and publication department violate discipline ", "" propaganda NaCan publicity content", and "in conformity with the facts serious content.
Announcement no confidently bisiness weekly what content to appear alleged that the serious situation.
This is not the first Chinese media reported involved because the energy industry into trouble. Three years ago, caijing magazine was forced to remove an article about the same and national power grid.
China's state-owned enterprises at this time with the media, including the media, showing a new domineering. Long-term since, the state-owned enterprises have insisted on review published before, so it agreed to cooperate with reporters. This may explain why in a certain extent, the state-owned media rarely quoted officials.
But recently, state-owned enterprises have become more aggressive attitude. A few weeks ago, Wall Street journal received a phone call from state-owned enterprises, public relations department about us an article about this company overseas investment reports. The public relations staff said, you start to our company's illegal exposure of commercial secrets, We request your immediate from your website to delete this article, and your sources. The pr people then said, if not obey, we will take legal action for you. Of course, we didn't move this article, and refused to answer these requirements.
Bisiness weekly is good, it said in a statement "this result, we accept it."
Bisiness weekly ser.1 next month, but the "China business news has been exposed shady" action again. China's next to think through after publication will to challenge the state grid or any other state-owned enterprises at present, and the public - and to the giant's careful attention than ever more important.